Washington v. Recuenco

2006 United States Supreme Court case
Washington v. Recuenco
Argued April 17, 2006
Decided June 26, 2006
Full case nameWashington v. Arturo R. Recuenco
Citations548 U.S. 212 (more)
126 S. Ct. 2546; 165 L. Ed. 2d 466; 2006 U.S. LEXIS 5164
Holding
Failure to submit a sentencing factor to the jury is not "structural" error, and therefore does not entitle to reversal of conviction if the error was harmless.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy · David Souter
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Case opinions
MajorityThomas, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Breyer, and Alito
ConcurrenceKennedy
DissentStevens
DissentGinsburg, joined by Stevens

Washington v. Recuenco, 548 U.S. 212 (2006), is the United States Supreme Court case of Recuenco, a man who was convicted of second-degree assault after he threatened his wife with a handgun, and subsequently sentenced by the Washington Supreme Court based not only on the conviction, but based on Recuenco's use of a handgun, charged as assault with a deadly weapon. His sentencing included a three-year enhancement, a standard based on his being armed with a firearm, which is greater than the one-year enhancement he would have received for assault with a deadly weapon. As the jury in the case had not found that Recuenco was armed with a firearm, he argued that the sentencing enhancement violated his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial.

At the Supreme Court, the State conceded that a Blakely error had occurred, but argued that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. The Court held in a 7-2 opinion that a Blakely error could be considered harmless.[1]

References

  1. ^ The Supreme Court, 2005 Term — Leading Cases, 120 Harv. L. Rev. 192 (2006).

External links

  • Text of Washington v. Recuenco, 548 U.S. 212 (2006) is available from: Cornell  CourtListener  Google Scholar  Justia  Oyez (oral argument audio) 
  • v
  • t
  • e
Speedy Trial Clause
Impartial Jury Clause
Availability
Impartiality
Facts found
Size and unanimity
Vicinage Clause
Impeachment of verdicts
Information Clause
Out-of-court statements
Face-to-face confrontation
Restrictions on cross-examination
Choice
Appointment
Conflict-free
Ineffective assistance
Uncounseled statements
Pro se representation


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e