Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC
1990 United States Supreme Court case
| Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued March 28, 1990 Decided June 27, 1990 | |
| Full case name | Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Co |
| Citations | 497 U.S. 547 (more) 110 S. Ct. 2997; 111 L. Ed. 2d 445 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Winter Park Communications, Inc. v. FCC, 873 F.2d 347 (D.C. Cir. 1989), affirmed and remanded; Shurberg Broadcasting of Hartford, Inc. v. FCC, 876 F.2d 902 (D.C. Cir. 1989), reversed and remanded. |
| Holding | |
| The FCC policies do not violate equal protection since they bear the imprimatur of longstanding congressional support and direction and are substantially related to the achievement of the important governmental objective of broadcast diversity. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Brennan, joined by White, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens |
| Concurrence | Stevens |
| Dissent | O'Connor, joined by Rehnquist, Scalia, Kennedy |
| Dissent | Kennedy, joined by Scalia |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. amend. XIV | |
Overruled by | |
| Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña, 515 U.S. 200 (1995) | |
Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC, 497 U.S. 547 (1990), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that intermediate scrutiny should be applied to equal protection challenges to federal statutes using benign racial classifications.[1] The Court distinguished the previous year's decision City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co.,[2] by noting that it applied only to actions by state and local governments.[3] Metro Broadcasting was overruled by Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña, which held that strict scrutiny should be applied to federal laws that use benign racial classifications.[4] This opinion was the last authored by William J. Brennan Jr., the longtime leader of the Court's liberal wing.[5]
See also
References
- ^ Varat, J.D. et al. Constitutional Law Cases and Materials, Concise Thirteenth Edition. Foundation Press, NY: 2009, p. 610
- ^ City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469 (1989).
- ^ Varat, p. 616
- ^ Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña, 515 U.S. 200, 227 (1995).
- ^ "William J. Brennan". Oyez. Retrieved February 11, 2024.
In Brennan's last vote as a Supreme Court Justice, he sided with the majority in Metro Broadcasting v. Federal Communications Commission (1990), upholding the constitutionality of two federal affirmative action programs aimed at increasing black ownership of radio and television stations.
External links
- Text of Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC, 497 U.S. 547 (1990) is available from: CourtListener Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
- v
- t
- e
lower court decisions
| Education |
|
|---|---|
| Employment |
|
| Grants, Contracting, and Set-Asides |
|
and edicts
- Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866
- Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (1868)
- Executive Order 10925 (1961)
- Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
- Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
- Executive Order 11246 (1965)
- Proposition 209 (CA, 1996)
- Initiative 200 (WA, 1998)
- Proposal 2 (MI, 2006)
- Amendment 46 (CO, 2008, failed)
- Initiative 424 (NE, 2008)
- Proposition 107 (AZ, 2010)
- State Question 759 (OK, 2012)
- Referendum 88 (WA, 2019, failed)
- Proposition 16 (CA, 2020, failed)
- Peter Arcidiacono
- Edward Blum
- Carl Cohen
- Ward Connerly
- Arthur Fletcher
- Richard Kahlenberg
- Richard Sander
- Stuart Taylor Jr.
- Abigail Thermstrom
- Stephan Thermstrom
- Ron Unz
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
- v
- t
- e
